From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCray v. State

Supreme Court of Florida.
Oct 20, 2014
153 So. 3d 907 (Fla. 2014)

Opinion

No. SC14–1810.

2014-10-20

Darrin L. McCRAY, Petitioner(s) v. STATE of Florida, Respondent(s).


To the extent that petitioner seeks a writ of prohibition, the petition is hereby denied because petitioner has failed to demonstrate that a lower court is attempting to act in excess of its jurisdiction. See Mandico v. Taos Constr., Inc., 605 So.2d 850 (Fla.1992); English v. McCrary, 348 So.2d 293 (Fla.1977). To the extent that petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus, because petitioner has failed to show a clear legal right to the relief requested, he is not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So.2d 10, 11 (Fla.2000). All pending motions are hereby denied. No rehearing will be entertained by this Court.

PARIENTE, LEWIS, CANADY, POLSTON, and PERRY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

McCray v. State

Supreme Court of Florida.
Oct 20, 2014
153 So. 3d 907 (Fla. 2014)
Case details for

McCray v. State

Case Details

Full title:Darrin L. McCRAY, Petitioner(s) v. STATE of Florida, Respondent(s).

Court:Supreme Court of Florida.

Date published: Oct 20, 2014

Citations

153 So. 3d 907 (Fla. 2014)