From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCoy v. Woods

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Nov 17, 2023
4:23-cv-00869-JM-JJV (E.D. Ark. Nov. 17, 2023)

Opinion

4:23-cv-00869-JM-JJV

11-17-2023

TERRY LAMAR MCCOY PLAINTIFF v. LAFAYETTE WOODS, JR. Sheriff, Brassell Adult Detention Center, et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Partial Recommendation submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. (Doc.11) No objections have been filed, and the time to do so has passed. After careful review, this Court adopts the Partial Recommendation in its entirety as its findings in all respects.

Therefore, Plaintiff may proceed with his Fourteenth Amendment claim against Defendants Woods and Hudson. In contrast, Defendants Tompkins, Smith, Baker, Marshall, Lee, Johnson, Alexander, and Iverson are dismissed without prejudice because Plaintiff has not pled any plausible claims against them. Finally, it is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.


Summaries of

McCoy v. Woods

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Nov 17, 2023
4:23-cv-00869-JM-JJV (E.D. Ark. Nov. 17, 2023)
Case details for

McCoy v. Woods

Case Details

Full title:TERRY LAMAR MCCOY PLAINTIFF v. LAFAYETTE WOODS, JR. Sheriff, Brassell…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Nov 17, 2023

Citations

4:23-cv-00869-JM-JJV (E.D. Ark. Nov. 17, 2023)