From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCoy v. Stephens

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Apr 10, 2014
561 F. App'x 432 (5th Cir. 2014)

Opinion

No. 13-10995

04-10-2014

JAMES BELL MCCOY, SR., Petitioner - Appellant v. WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, Respondent - Appellee


Summary Calendar


Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:09-CV-405

Before BARKSDALE, HAYNES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

James Bell McCoy, Sr., Texas prisoner # 1299701, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, appeals the denial of his motion to recuse the district judge who presided over two matters in which McCoy challenged a state-court conviction. The court denied the motion because the case was closed and on appeal to this court.

"[T]he filing of a valid notice of appeal from a final order of the district court divests that court of jurisdiction to act on the matters involved in the appeal, except to aid the appeal, correct clerical errors, or enforce its judgment". Ross v. Marshall, 426 F.3d 745, 751 (5th Cir. 2005) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). McCoy filed his motion to recuse after filing notices of appeal from the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition and the denial of his motion filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). Accordingly, the district court lacked jurisdiction to rule on the recusal motion.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

McCoy v. Stephens

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Apr 10, 2014
561 F. App'x 432 (5th Cir. 2014)
Case details for

McCoy v. Stephens

Case Details

Full title:JAMES BELL MCCOY, SR., Petitioner - Appellant v. WILLIAM STEPHENS…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 10, 2014

Citations

561 F. App'x 432 (5th Cir. 2014)

Citing Cases

Tate v. Zaleski

However, while the Court retains jurisdiction over the enforcement of the judgment, the Court does not have…

Murray v. BP Expl. & Prod.

. Because a motion to recuse a judge does not fall into one of these categories, this Court lacks…