McCoy v. State

Full title: Kenneth Harold McCOY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Date published: Jul 11, 2012

92 So. 3d 883 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. 4D11–1338.

2012-07-11

Kenneth Harold McCOY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the SeventeenthJudicial Circuit, Broward County; Andrew L. Siegel, Judge; L.T. Case No. 07–2440 CF10A. Kenneth Harold McCoy, East Palatka, pro se. No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the SeventeenthJudicial Circuit, Broward County; Andrew L. Siegel, Judge; L.T. Case No. 07–2440 CF10A.
Kenneth Harold McCoy, East Palatka, pro se. No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Brooks v. State, 969 So.2d 238 (Fla.2007). As to appellant's request on appeal to assert new claims, Spera v. State, 971 So.2d 754, 761 (Fla.2007), permits the amendment of claims where the trial court finds them legally insufficient. Here, the court did not find appellant's one claim legally insufficient. Spera does not apply to permit the assertion of new, and now untimely, claims. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(b).

WARNER, POLEN and GROSS, JJ., concur.