From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCoy v. Sacramento Co. Jail

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 24, 2023
2:22-cv-2182 KJM DB P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-2182 KJM DB P

02-24-2023

JEROME ELI McCOY, Petitioner, v. SACRAMENTO CO. JAIL, Respondent.


ORDER

DEBOFAH BARNES, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner, a pretrial detainee proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2254. On February 1, 2023, this court recommended the petition be dismissed as duplicative of petitioner's pending civil rights action. In a document filed on February 16, petitioner states that he objects to the findings and recommendations. However, petitioner provides no reasons for his objections. Petitioner is advised that if he objects to a magistrate judge's findings and recommendations, he must provide a basis for that objection. See E.D. Cal. R. 304(b). Petitioner will be given additional time to provide the court with reasons for his objections.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within twenty days, petitioner shall file a supplement to his objections to the February 1 findings and recommendations. In that supplement, petitioner must explain his reasons for his objections.


Summaries of

McCoy v. Sacramento Co. Jail

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 24, 2023
2:22-cv-2182 KJM DB P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2023)
Case details for

McCoy v. Sacramento Co. Jail

Case Details

Full title:JEROME ELI McCOY, Petitioner, v. SACRAMENTO CO. JAIL, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Feb 24, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-2182 KJM DB P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2023)