From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mccoy v. Maxwell

Supreme Court of Ohio
May 13, 1964
199 N.E.2d 2 (Ohio 1964)

Opinion

No. 38707

Decided May 13, 1964.

Criminal law — Indigent accused — Right to free copy of transcript of testimony — Must request by motion — Right of appeal from overruling of motion — Habeas corpus not available to determine constitutional right.

IN HABEAS CORPUS.

This is an action in habeas corpus originating in this court. In June 1959, the Grand Jury of Allen County returned an indictment charging petitioner, Theodis McCoy, with murder in the first degree. Counsel was appointed to represent him, and on a trial to a jury he was found guilty of murder in the second degree. A motion for a new trial was heard and overruled, and petitioner was sentenced to the Ohio Penitentiary.

Mr. Theodis McCoy, in propria persona. Mr. William B. Saxbe, attorney general, and Mr. William C. Baird, for respondent.


The petitioner in the instant case bases his right to release on the failure of the state to furnish him, as an indigent, a free copy of the transcript of testimony relating to his trial, for the purpose of appeal.

Petitioner was convicted in 1959, but he did not file his motion for leave to appeal until 1962, well out of rule for an appeal as a matter of right. The Court of Appeals found that there was neither a showing of any reason for failure to file his appeal within rule when he could have filed his appeal as of right nor any showing of probable error in the proceedings of the trial court. Motion for leave to appeal was denied by the Supreme Court.

An accused who desires a transcript of testimony at the expense of the state for the purpose of appeal must request such transcript from the trial court by motion, and if such motion is overruled the accused has the right to appeal from such order. State, ex rel. Wilson, v. McMahon, Judge, 172 Ohio St. 438.

The question as to whether an accused has been deprived of his constitutional rights by the lack of a transcript of his trial is a question which must be raised by appeal and is not cognizable in habeas corpus.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

TAFT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, MATTHIAS, O'NEILL, GRIFFITH, HERBERT and GIBSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mccoy v. Maxwell

Supreme Court of Ohio
May 13, 1964
199 N.E.2d 2 (Ohio 1964)
Case details for

Mccoy v. Maxwell

Case Details

Full title:MCCOY v. MAXWELL, WARDEN

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: May 13, 1964

Citations

199 N.E.2d 2 (Ohio 1964)
199 N.E.2d 2

Citing Cases

Vaughn v. Maxwell

Finally, petitioner urges that the refusal of the Court of Appeals to provide him with counsel to prosecute…

State v. Armstrong

If the trial court does not order a transcript of the record for an indigent defendant in a criminal case,…