From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCoy v. Carlson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Jun 26, 2019
Case No. 3:17-cv-432 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 26, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 3:17-cv-432

06-26-2019

GARY L. MCCOY, Plaintiff, v. DR. RODNEY L. CARLSON, et al., Defendants.



Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman

ORDER AND ENTRY: (1) ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. 92); AND (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR COSTS AND FEES FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS (DOC. 35)

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman (doc. 92), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). The parties have not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: (1) the Report and Recommendation (doc. 92) is ADOPTED in full; and (2) Plaintiff's motion for costs and fees for service of process (doc. 35) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: June 26, 2019

*s/Thomas M. Rose

Thomas M. Rose

United States District Judge


Summaries of

McCoy v. Carlson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Jun 26, 2019
Case No. 3:17-cv-432 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 26, 2019)
Case details for

McCoy v. Carlson

Case Details

Full title:GARY L. MCCOY, Plaintiff, v. DR. RODNEY L. CARLSON, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Jun 26, 2019

Citations

Case No. 3:17-cv-432 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 26, 2019)

Citing Cases

Kendell v. Shanklin

But before a plaintiff is entitled to such an award, she must first "make a sufficient showing that [she]…

Kendell v. Shanklin

But before a plaintiff is entitled to such an award, she must first "make a sufficient showing that [she]…