From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCoy v. Alison

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Apr 11, 2022
1:22-cv-00234 JLT EPG (PC) (E.D. Cal. Apr. 11, 2022)

Opinion

1:22-cv-00234 JLT EPG (PC)

04-11-2022

JOSEPH RAYMOND MCCOY, Plaintiff, v. KATHILEEN ALISON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING IN FULL THE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO PAY THE $402.00 FILING FEE IN FULL (Doc. 6)

The assigned magistrate judge issued Findings and Recommendations that Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied. (Doc. 6.) The magistrate judge found Plaintiff is subject to the three strikes bar under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) (Id. at 2-3) and that the allegations in Plaintiff's complaint do not satisfy the “imminent danger of serious physical injury” exception to Section 1915(g). (Id. at 3-4.) Therefore, the magistrate judge recommended Plaintiff be directed to pay the filing fee in full to proceed with this action. (Id. at 4.)

The Court served the Findings and Recommendations on Plaintiff, which contained notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within 14 days from the date of service. (Doc. 6 at 5.) In addition, the Court advised Plaintiff “that failure to file objections within the specified time may result in the waiver of rights on appeal.” (Id., citing Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 838-39 (9th Cir. 2014); Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991).) Despite the Court granting Plaintiff an extension of time to file objections, he did not do so.

According to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire matter, the Court concludes the Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis. Accordingly, the Court

ORDERS

1. The Findings and Recommendations entered on March 1, 2022 (Doc. 6), are ADOPTED in full
2. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), Plaintiff is not permitted to proceed in forma pauperis in this action.
3. Within 30 days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff SHALL pay in full the $402.00 filing fee for this action; and
4. Plaintiff is advised that failure to pay the required filing fee as ordered will result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

McCoy v. Alison

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Apr 11, 2022
1:22-cv-00234 JLT EPG (PC) (E.D. Cal. Apr. 11, 2022)
Case details for

McCoy v. Alison

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH RAYMOND MCCOY, Plaintiff, v. KATHILEEN ALISON, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Apr 11, 2022

Citations

1:22-cv-00234 JLT EPG (PC) (E.D. Cal. Apr. 11, 2022)