From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCormick v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 14, 1975
309 So. 2d 257 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

Opinion

No. 74-68.

March 14, 1975.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, St. Lucie County, Wallace Sample, J.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Richard S. Power, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Anthony J. Golden, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Appellant, convicted of grand larceny, contends that the evidence was insufficient to show that at the time of the taking the property had a market value of $100 or more.

The property stolen consisted of eight coats taken from the display racks of a ladies ready-to-wear store and the evidence established that they had a retail value of approximately $300. Market value is the price for which an article is bought and sold in the ordinary course of business. The evidence here was sufficient for a jury to determine beyond a reasonable doubt that at the time of the taking the eight coats had a market value of $100 or more.

Affirmed.

WALDEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

McCormick v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 14, 1975
309 So. 2d 257 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)
Case details for

McCormick v. State

Case Details

Full title:CAROL ANN McCORMICK, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Mar 14, 1975

Citations

309 So. 2d 257 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

Citing Cases

State v. Tunnell

Market value is the price for which an article is bought and sold in the ordinary course of business.…

S.P.S. v. State

" Given this definition, the court concluded that "credit on a charge account is property which may be the…