From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCormick v. Norman

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Aug 1, 1984
453 So. 2d 515 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

No. 83-581.

August 1, 1984.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Manatee County, Paul E. Logan, J.

Ernest S. Marshall, Bradenton, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.


We affirm the trial court's order enforcing an Ohio child custody modification decree but otherwise declining to exercise modification jurisdiction over this matter. See §§ 61.1328 and 61.133, Fla. Stat. (1981). We agree with the trial court's conclusion that appellant should exhaust her legal remedy in the state of Ohio through disposition of her pending motion for rehearing and by possible appeal from any adverse ruling. See § 61.1314, Fla. Stat. (1981). Under the particular circumstances presented, appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error or a gross miscarriage of justice resulting from the manner in which the trial court reached its findings.

AFFIRMED.

BOARDMAN, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and LEHAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

McCormick v. Norman

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Aug 1, 1984
453 So. 2d 515 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

McCormick v. Norman

Case Details

Full title:VIRGINIA A. McCORMICK, F/K/A VIRGINIA A. NORMAN, APPELLANT, v. DENNIS…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Aug 1, 1984

Citations

453 So. 2d 515 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Citing Cases

Sommer v. Sommer

1980); Barcus v. Barcus, 278 N.W.2d 646 (Iowa 1979); In re McDonald, 74 Mich. App. 119, 253 N.W.2d 678…

Fleming v. State

We reject this argument, because there is nothing in Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701 which says that…