From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCormack v. Culclager

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Jun 2, 2022
4:21-cv-01146-JM-ERE (E.D. Ark. Jun. 2, 2022)

Opinion

4:21-cv-01146-JM-ERE

06-02-2022

MICHAEL MCCORMACK ADC #141771 PLAINTIFF v. ANDREA CULCLAGER, et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

The Court has received a Recommendation for dismissal filed by Magistrate Judge Edie R. Ervin. The parties have not filed objections, and the time to do so has expired. After careful review of the record, the Court concludes that the Recommendation should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted as this Court's findings in all respects.

Defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. 22) is GRANTED. Mr. McCormack's claims are DISMISSED, without prejudice, based on his failure to state a plausible constitutional claim for relief against Defendants. The Clerk is instructed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

McCormack v. Culclager

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Jun 2, 2022
4:21-cv-01146-JM-ERE (E.D. Ark. Jun. 2, 2022)
Case details for

McCormack v. Culclager

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL MCCORMACK ADC #141771 PLAINTIFF v. ANDREA CULCLAGER, et al…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Jun 2, 2022

Citations

4:21-cv-01146-JM-ERE (E.D. Ark. Jun. 2, 2022)