From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McComb v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 10, 2002
815 So. 2d 776 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

No. 2D01-2167.

May 10, 2002.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Hillsborough County Chet; A. Tharpe, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Sean K. Ahmed, Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ronald Napolitano, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


We affirm the imposition of the minimum mandatory sentence as to count I of the conviction obtained against Arthur Kelly McComb. The sentence imposed for count IV, carrying a concealed firearm, improperly reflects a minimum mandatory sentence. In fact, the trial court orally pronounced that the minimum mandatory term was imposed as to count III, felon in possession. In order to avoid confusion, this should be corrected on remand.

Affirmed with instructions.

GREEN, SALCINES, and KELLY, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

McComb v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 10, 2002
815 So. 2d 776 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

McComb v. State

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR KELLY McCOMB, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: May 10, 2002

Citations

815 So. 2d 776 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)