From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCollum v. Harrison

United States District Court, District of Kansas
Sep 13, 2022
No. 22-2286-JAR-GEB (D. Kan. Sep. 13, 2022)

Opinion

22-2286-JAR-GEB

09-13-2022

RANDY MCCOLLUM, RONNIE MCCOLLUM, and APRIL HARAUGHTY, Plaintiffs, v. TODD HARRISON, JILL DILLIE, KENNETH DILLIE, FRANK MCCOLLUM, DONNIE MCCOLLUM, and CHARLES SPILLMAN, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

JULIE A. ROBINSON CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Fourteen days having passed, and no written objections being filed to the proposed findings and recommendations filed by Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer, and after a de novo determination upon the record pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b), the Court accepts as its own the recommended decision to deny Plaintiffs' Motions to Proceed in forma pauperis, and to dismiss this case under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted (Doc. 7).

The Report and Recommendation was delivered by certified mail to Plaintiffs Ronnie McCollum and April Haraughty on August 20, 2022; a copy was delivered by certified mail to Plaintiff Randy McCollum on August 24, 2022. Docs. 8, 9, 10.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED BY THE COURT that Plaintiffs' Motions to Proceed in forma pauperis (Docs. 2, 6) are denied in accordance with the August 17, 2022, Report and Recommendation (Doc. 7). This case is hereby dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

McCollum v. Harrison

United States District Court, District of Kansas
Sep 13, 2022
No. 22-2286-JAR-GEB (D. Kan. Sep. 13, 2022)
Case details for

McCollum v. Harrison

Case Details

Full title:RANDY MCCOLLUM, RONNIE MCCOLLUM, and APRIL HARAUGHTY, Plaintiffs, v. TODD…

Court:United States District Court, District of Kansas

Date published: Sep 13, 2022

Citations

No. 22-2286-JAR-GEB (D. Kan. Sep. 13, 2022)