Opinion
No. 25536
Decided October 2, 1935.
Supreme Court — Dismissals — No debatable constitutional question involved — Criminal law — Ordinance prohibiting discharge of firearms within city limits, constitutional — Dog may not be shot, when — Section 5838, General Code.
ERROR to the Court of Appeals of Hamilton county.
Messrs. Ratterman, Cowell Fletcher, for plaintiff in error.
Mr. John D. Ellis, city solicitor, Mr. Harry J. Wernke and Mr. Francis T. Bartlett, for defendant in error.
It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.
Petition in error dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., WILLIAMS, JONES, MATTHIAS and ZIMMERMAN, JJ., concur.