From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McClure v. Ingram

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jan 18, 1916
154 P. 575 (Okla. 1916)

Opinion

No. 6367

Opinion Filed January 18, 1916.

APPEAL AND ERROR — Failure to File Brief — Reversal. Where defendant in error files no brief, and the brief of plaintiff in error reasonably sustains his contention, the court will not examine the record to find some theory upon which to affirm the judgment, but same may be reversed.

(Syllabus by Brett, C.)

Error from County Court, Muskogee County; Thomas W. Leahy, Judge.

Action by A.T. Ingram against Sarah McClure. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. Reversed.

D.E. Herschelman, for plaintiff in error.


This cause was duly submitted in this court December 6, 1915. On November 9, 1915, the plaintiff in error filed her brief. The defendant in error has filed no brief, and assigns no reason for his failure to do so. The contention of plaintiff in error seems to be reasonably supported by the authorities cited in her brief. And under the authority of Midland Elevator Co. v. Harrah, 44 Okla. 154, 143 P. 1168, and the authorities therein cited, we recommend that the judgment be reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

By the Court: It is so ordered.


Summaries of

McClure v. Ingram

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jan 18, 1916
154 P. 575 (Okla. 1916)
Case details for

McClure v. Ingram

Case Details

Full title:McCLURE v. INGRAM

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Jan 18, 1916

Citations

154 P. 575 (Okla. 1916)
154 P. 575

Citing Cases

Bradley v. Morris

Following this rule the judgment in this case will be reversed and the case remanded to the trial court with…

Adams v. Butler

Shapleigh Hdw. Co. v. Pritchard, 25 Okla. 808, 108 P. 360; School Dist. No. 30, Pottawatomie County, v.…