McClenton v. Curry

Full title: RAYMOND E. McCLENTON, Petitioner, v. BEN CURRY, WARDEN, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Mar 22, 2011

CV 08-00569-VBF (MAN) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 22, 2011)

Opinion

RAYMOND E. McCLENTON, Petitioner, v. BEN CURRY, WARDEN, Respondent. No. CV 08-00569-VBF (MAN) United States District Court, C.D. California. March 22, 2011

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, all of the records herein, the Amended Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"), and Petitioner's "Opposition" to the Report. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of those matters to which objections have been stated in writing. Having completed its review, the Court accepts and adopts the Report and the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations therein.

         IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Petition is denied; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order and the Judgment herein on the parties.

         LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.