From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McClendon v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Apr 24, 2012
1:10CV411 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 24, 2012)

Opinion

1:10CV411

04-24-2012

BARBARA G. MCCLENDON, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

This matter is before the Court on a Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge recommending that Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings be granted, that Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings be denied, and that this case be remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings. The Recommendation was filed on January 4, 2012, and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). On January 12, 2012, Defendant filed timely Objections to the Recommendation. The Court has now reviewed de novo the Objections and the portions of the Recommendation to which objection was made, and finds that the Objections do not change the substance of the United States Magistrate Judge's ruling. The Magistrate Judge's Recommendation [Doc. #14] is therefore affirmed and adopted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [Doc. #9] is GRANTED, that Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [Doc. #11] is DENIED, and that this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation. A Judgment remanding this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order.

_________________

United States District Judge


Summaries of

McClendon v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Apr 24, 2012
1:10CV411 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 24, 2012)
Case details for

McClendon v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:BARBARA G. MCCLENDON, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

Date published: Apr 24, 2012

Citations

1:10CV411 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 24, 2012)

Citing Cases

Fender v. Berryhill

Therefore, even if the ALJ included Plaintiff's proposed limitation, he would nonetheless qualify to work the…

Bennett v. Colvin

R. 17. As discussed in the M&R, SRRTs are a narrower subset than the full range of unskilled work and/or…