Opinion
No. ED 104381
05-30-2017
Jeffrey MCCLAIN, et al., Respondents, v. VAN DEN BERK-CLARK PROPERTIES, INC., Appellant, and James A. Farr, Respondent.
FOR APPELLANT: Jeffrey T. Weisman, 1221 Locust St., Ste. 800, St. Louis, MO 63103. FOR RESPONDENT: Michael A. Gross, Atty. for Respondents, 231 South Bemiston Ave., Ste. 250, St. Louis, MO 63105, Joseph F. Yeckel, Atty. for Respondents, 7710 Carondelet Ave., Ste. 208, St. Louis, MO 63105, Frank D. Keefe, Atty. for Resp. Jeffrey McClain, 122 Clarkson Executive Park, Ellisville, MO 63011, Vincent D. Vogler, Jr., Michael A. Kasperek, Atty. for Resp. James Farr, 11756 Borman Dr., Ste. 200, St. Louis, MO 63141.
FOR APPELLANT: Jeffrey T. Weisman, 1221 Locust St., Ste. 800, St. Louis, MO 63103.
FOR RESPONDENT: Michael A. Gross, Atty. for Respondents, 231 South Bemiston Ave., Ste. 250, St. Louis, MO 63105, Joseph F. Yeckel, Atty. for Respondents, 7710 Carondelet Ave., Ste. 208, St. Louis, MO 63105, Frank D. Keefe, Atty. for Resp. Jeffrey McClain, 122 Clarkson Executive Park, Ellisville, MO 63011, Vincent D. Vogler, Jr., Michael A. Kasperek, Atty. for Resp. James Farr, 11756 Borman Dr., Ste. 200, St. Louis, MO 63141.
Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Van Den Berk-Clark Properties, Inc. ("Appellant") appeals the judgment denying its motion to set aside the sheriff's sale that resulted in Appellant's property being sold to James A. Farr per a writ of execution to collect on a judgment against Appellant in favor of Jeffrey and Robin McClain. We find no error has occurred.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).