From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCauley v. William Bradley Son

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 1, 1915
171 App. Div. 934 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)

Opinion

December, 1915.

Present — Ingraham, P.J., McLaughlin, Clarke, Scott and Smith, JJ.; McLaughlin, J., dissented.


We think that the complaint clearly states a cause of action, and that the facts stated in the opening do not so qualify the allegations of the complaint as to justify a dismissal of the complaint upon the opening. The judgment appealed from must be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.


Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide event.


Summaries of

McCauley v. William Bradley Son

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 1, 1915
171 App. Div. 934 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)
Case details for

McCauley v. William Bradley Son

Case Details

Full title:MARGARET A. McCAULEY, as Administratrix, etc., Appellant, v . WILLIAM…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1915

Citations

171 App. Div. 934 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)