Opinion
2:11-CV-1538 JCM (NJK)
01-25-2013
ROBERT JOSEPH MCCARTY, Plaintiff, v. JOHN V. ROOS, et al., Defendants.
ORDER
Presently before the court is state defendants Patrick Saunders and Charlene Hoerth's motion for extension of time to respond to plaintiff's motion for leave to amend complaint. (Doc. # 122). Pro se plaintiff Robert Joseph McCarty responded. (Doc. # 124).
State defendants request an extension of time based on the length and complexity of pro se plaintiff's, Robert Joseph McCarty, second amended complaint. Plaintiff seeks leave to allege constitutional violations that did not appear in his first amended complaint.
Good cause appearing,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that state defendants Patrick Saunders and Charlene Hoerth's motion for extension of time to respond to plaintiff's motion for leave to amend complaint (doc. # 122) be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants have up to, and including, February 12, 2013, to respond to plaintiff's motion for leave to amend.
________________________?
UNTIED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE