From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mccarthy v. Tower Assoc

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 21, 2006
32 A.D.3d 752 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

8790, 8790A

September 21, 2006.

Amended judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert D. Lippmann, J., and a jury), entered August 24, 2005, inter alia, awarding plaintiff worker damages for personal injuries sustained at a construction site against defendant building owner Tower Associates, defendant general contractor Structure Tone, defaulting defendant sub-subcontractor and plaintiffs employer Buckley, and defendant-appellant manufacturer Unisul, apportioning fault 35% against Unisul and 65% against Buckley, and awarding Tower and Structure Tone common-law indemnification against Unisul, unanimously modified, on the law, to limit the award of indemnification to 35% and otherwise affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered July 8, 2005, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the judgment.

Morris Duffy Alonso Faley, New York (Pauline E. Glaser of counsel), for appellant.

Pomerance Collins, Levittown (Daniel Collins of counsel), for Theresa McCarthy, respondent.

Barry, McTiernan Moore, New York (Laurel A. Wedinger of counsel), for 390 Tower Associates, LLC and Structure Tone, Inc., respondents

Before: Andrias, J.E, Marlow, Sweeny, McGuire and Malone, JJ.


The jury's finding that plaintiff's negligence was not a substantial factor in causing her injuries is not against the weight of the evidence. We find no reversible error in the trial court's evidentiary rulings challenged on appeal. However, because Unisul was found to be less than 50% at fault, the award of indemnification against it, for Tower's and Structure Tone's vicarioxis liability under Labor Law § 241 (6), must be limited to its own 35% share of fault ( see Frank v Meadowlakes Dev. Corp., 6 NY3d 687), and we modify accordingly.


Summaries of

Mccarthy v. Tower Assoc

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 21, 2006
32 A.D.3d 752 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

Mccarthy v. Tower Assoc

Case Details

Full title:THERESA MCCARTHY, Respondent, v. 390 TOWER ASSOCIATES, LLC, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 21, 2006

Citations

32 A.D.3d 752 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 6613
820 N.Y.S.2d 798

Citing Cases

DIOP v. MADISON IMMOBILIER LLC

Aside from the fact that RC has not yet been found liable for Diop's injuries, Madison has codefendants, the…