From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCarthy v. Duncan

Supreme Court of Ohio
Oct 9, 1929
172 N.E. 377 (Ohio 1929)

Opinion

No. 21872

Decided October 9, 1929.

Supreme Court — Dismissals — No debatable constitutional question involved.

ERROR to the Court of Appeals of Franklin county.

Mr. J.M. Howard and Mr. Charles A. Eberly, for plaintiffs in error.

Messrs. Vorys, Sater, Seymour Pease, Mr. Henry J. Linton and Mr. C.A. Eberly, for defendants in error.


It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

Petition in error dismissed.

MARSHALL, C.J., JONES, MATTHIAS, DAY and ALLEN, JJ., concur.

KINKADE and ROBINSON, JJ., not participating.


Summaries of

McCarthy v. Duncan

Supreme Court of Ohio
Oct 9, 1929
172 N.E. 377 (Ohio 1929)
Case details for

McCarthy v. Duncan

Case Details

Full title:McCARTHY ET AL. v. DUNCAN ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Oct 9, 1929

Citations

172 N.E. 377 (Ohio 1929)
172 N.E. 377