From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCarthy Improvement Co. v. Blythe Dev. Co.

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Asheville Division
Nov 14, 2022
CIVIL 1:22-cv-00056-MR-WCM (W.D.N.C. Nov. 14, 2022)

Opinion

CIVIL 1:22-cv-00056-MR-WCM

11-14-2022

McCARTHY IMPROVEMENT COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. BLYTHE DEVELOPMENT CO., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, and LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant, v. WESTERN SURETY COMPANY, Third-Party Defendant.


ORDER

MARTIN REIDINGER, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the parties' Joint Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Litigation [Doc. 31]. 1

Pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-569.7 and 9 U.S.C. § 3, the parties request the Court to refer the underlying disputes between the Plaintiff McCarthy Improvement Company (“MCI”) and the Defendant Blythe Development Company (“Blythe”) to arbitration and to stay the proceedings herein until such arbitration proceedings have concluded. For grounds, the parties state that Article X of the construction Subcontract between Blythe and MCI [Doc. 12-1] contains a valid and enforceable agreement to arbitrate between MCI and Blythe, but that the surety bonds furnished by defendant Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (“Liberty”) and third-party defendant Western Surety Company (“Western”) do not include arbitration provisions. The parties contend that the disputes between MCI and Blythe in this civil action should be referred to arbitration pursuant to the Subcontract, and that Liberty and Western have agreed to be bound by the arbitrator's determination as to the underlying contract dispute between MCI and Blythe, but reserve all their rights to adjudication of any surety-specific defenses in this Court if and to the extent necessary following arbitration. Further, the parties have agreed to designate Jason James as the single arbitrator of the dispute to conduct the Arbitration in accordance with the American Arbitration Association's Construction 2

Industry Arbitration Rules without being subject to the American Arbitration Association administration and fees.

Having carefully considered the Joint Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Litigation, and for cause shown, the Court hereby enters the following Order.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the parties' Joint Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Litigation is GRANTED as follows:

1. MCI's First and Second Claims for Relief against Blythe and Count One of Blythe's counterclaim against MCI are hereby referred to binding arbitration according to Article X of the Subcontract, N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-569.7, and 9 U.S.C. § 3.

2. Jason James is designated as a single arbitrator of the dispute to conduct the Arbitration in accordance with the American Arbitration Association's Construction Industry Arbitration Rules without being subject to American Arbitration Association administration and fees.

3. The remaining surety-related claims and defenses in this civil action are hereby STAYED pending the outcome of the arbitration between MCI and Blythe.

4. The parties shall submit status reports to the Court every ninety (90) days to advise the Court of the status of the arbitration. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

McCarthy Improvement Co. v. Blythe Dev. Co.

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Asheville Division
Nov 14, 2022
CIVIL 1:22-cv-00056-MR-WCM (W.D.N.C. Nov. 14, 2022)
Case details for

McCarthy Improvement Co. v. Blythe Dev. Co.

Case Details

Full title:McCARTHY IMPROVEMENT COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. BLYTHE DEVELOPMENT CO.…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Asheville Division

Date published: Nov 14, 2022

Citations

CIVIL 1:22-cv-00056-MR-WCM (W.D.N.C. Nov. 14, 2022)