From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCann v. Mahoney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 10, 1995
214 A.D.2d 607 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

April 10, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Burke, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs' motion as the defendant came forward with sufficient evidence of the plaintiff-driver's negligence to raise an issue of fact regarding the comparative fault of the parties (see, Nitzke v Loveland, 188 A.D.2d 1058; compare, Crociata v Vasquez, 168 A.D.2d 410; Benjarko v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 162 A.D.2d 572). Balletta, J.P., Thompson, Santucci, Altman and Hart, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

McCann v. Mahoney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 10, 1995
214 A.D.2d 607 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

McCann v. Mahoney

Case Details

Full title:MARYELLEN McCANN et al., Appellants, v. JOSEPH F. MAHONEY, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 10, 1995

Citations

214 A.D.2d 607 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
624 N.Y.S.2d 963

Citing Cases

Kirkland v. Hirsch

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. The Supreme Court properly concluded…