From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCamey v. Cal. Dep't of Corr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 7, 2013
No. 2:12-cv-0362 JAM AC P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 7, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:12-cv-0362 JAM AC P

03-07-2013

ROYALTON McCAMEY, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff filed this action as a state prisoner proceeding pro se seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has moved for voluntary dismissal of defendant Dr. Lipson from this case. Defendant Lipson has not filed an answer or a motion for summary judgment. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(I), defendant Dr. Lipson is dismissed.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. Pursuant to plaintiff's request at ECF No. 41, the Clerk of Court shall note in the case docket that defendant Lipson has been voluntarily dismissed pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(I);

2. Defendant Lipson's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 14) is vacated from the court's calendar as moot;

3. Proceedings continue as to the motion to dismiss (ECF No. 31) filed on behalf of defendants Malet and Awatami; in accordance with the court's order (ECF No. 39) and defendants' (second) re-service at ECF No. 40, plaintiff has until March 26, 2013 to file his opposition, after which defendants have seven days to file a reply.

_______________

ALLISON CLAIRE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

McCamey v. Cal. Dep't of Corr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 7, 2013
No. 2:12-cv-0362 JAM AC P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 7, 2013)
Case details for

McCamey v. Cal. Dep't of Corr.

Case Details

Full title:ROYALTON McCAMEY, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 7, 2013

Citations

No. 2:12-cv-0362 JAM AC P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 7, 2013)