From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCalla v. Nord

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Oct 20, 2023
4:22-cv-00675-KAW (N.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2023)

Opinion

4:22-cv-00675-KAW

10-20-2023

RICHARD A MCCALLA, Plaintiff, v. JAMES NORD, Defendant.


ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITIONS TO DEFENDANT'S MOTIONS IN LIMINE

RE: DKT. NOS. 75-78

KYNDIS A. WESTMORE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On October 20, 2023, Plaintiff filed separate oppositions to Defendant's four motions in limine. (Dkt. Nos. 75-78.) This was done in violation of the undersigned's standing order, which requires that all oppositions to motions in limine be addressed in a single court filing not to exceed 25 pages. (See Judge Westmore's Standing Order ¶¶ 6(c)(3), 6(d).)

Accordingly, Plaintiff's separately-filed oppositions to the motions in limine (Dkt. Nos. 75-78) are STRICKEN. Plaintiff may refile his oppositions in a single document not to exceed 25 pages.

The parties are generally reminded of their obligation to provide chambers copies in both hard copy and Word format (.doc or .docx) within one court day of filing.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

McCalla v. Nord

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Oct 20, 2023
4:22-cv-00675-KAW (N.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2023)
Case details for

McCalla v. Nord

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD A MCCALLA, Plaintiff, v. JAMES NORD, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Oct 20, 2023

Citations

4:22-cv-00675-KAW (N.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2023)