From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCabe v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Aug 10, 2015
3:14-cv-00396-LRH-WGC (D. Nev. Aug. 10, 2015)

Summary

finding a conflict between a telephone quotation clerk job, described in the DOT as sedentary work, and the need for a sit/stand option

Summary of this case from Garst v. Berryhill

Opinion

3:14-cv-00396-LRH-WGC

08-10-2015

SUZANNE MCCABE, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant.


ORDER

Before this Court is the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb (doc. #17) entered on July 17, 2015, recommending granting Plaintiff's Motion for Reversal and/or Remand (doc. #10), filed on December 12, 2014, and denying Defendant's Cross-Motion to Affirm (doc. #16), filed on March 13, 2015. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. The action was referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)B and Local Rule 1B 1-4 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.

Refers to court's docket number. --------

The Court has conducted its de novo review in this case, has fully considered the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) (1) (B) and Local Rule IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#17) entered on July 17, 2015, should be adopted and accepted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#17) entered on July 17, 2015, is adopted and accepted, and Plaintiff's Motion for Reversal and/or Remand (doc. #10) is GRANTED and this matter is REMANDED to the ALJ to address the apparent conflicts between the VE testimony and the DOT as indicated in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Cross-Motion to Affirm (doc. #16) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 10th day of August, 2015.

/s/_________

LARRY R. HICKS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

McCabe v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Aug 10, 2015
3:14-cv-00396-LRH-WGC (D. Nev. Aug. 10, 2015)

finding a conflict between a telephone quotation clerk job, described in the DOT as sedentary work, and the need for a sit/stand option

Summary of this case from Garst v. Berryhill

finding an apparent conflict presented by VE testimony regarding jobs that will allow for a sit-stand option when the DOT does not address a sit-stand option

Summary of this case from Hall v. Colvin
Case details for

McCabe v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:SUZANNE MCCABE, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Aug 10, 2015

Citations

3:14-cv-00396-LRH-WGC (D. Nev. Aug. 10, 2015)

Citing Cases

Wells v. Colvin

Id. at *3. Wells also cites to McCabe v. Colvin, No. 3:14-CV-00396-LRH, 2015 WL 4740509, at *9 (D. Nev. Aug.…

Ulloa v. Colvin

However, since the DOT for the jobs of rehabilitation counselor and rehabilitation supervisor (DOT…