From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McBroom v. Department of Revenue

Oregon Supreme Court
Nov 27, 1998
328 Or. 15 (Or. 1998)

Opinion

Nos. OTC 4075; SC S44722

Argued and submitted November 10, 1998.

Filed: November 27, 1998. Petition for reconsideration denied February 2, 1999.

On appeal from the Oregon Tax Court, Carl N. Byers, Judge.

14 OTR 239 (1997).

Lyle McBroom, appellant pro se, waived argument and filed the briefs.

Jerry Bronner, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Hardy Myers, Attorney General.

Before Carson, Chief Justice, and Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Durham, Leeson, and Riggs, Justices.

Kulongoski, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.


PER CURIAM

The judgment of the Tax Court is affirmed.


Taxpayer appeals from a judgment of the Oregon Tax Court that affirmed the Department of Revenue's assessment of personal income tax against taxpayer for the 1991 tax year. Taxpayer contends that the gain that he realized upon the exercise of a stock option given to him by his employer was not taxable in Oregon, because he no longer was an Oregon resident at the time he exercised the option.

This court has considered each of taxpayer's supporting legal arguments and concludes that none is well taken. An explanation of our reasons for affirming the Tax Court's decision unlikely would benefit the bench, bar, or public.

The judgment of the Tax Court is affirmed.


Summaries of

McBroom v. Department of Revenue

Oregon Supreme Court
Nov 27, 1998
328 Or. 15 (Or. 1998)
Case details for

McBroom v. Department of Revenue

Case Details

Full title:Lyle McBROOM, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon…

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Nov 27, 1998

Citations

328 Or. 15 (Or. 1998)
969 P.2d 380

Citing Cases

Garcia v. Dep't of Revenue

Defendant alleges that all of the gain Plaintiff realized from the sale of the stock options should be…

Wardrop v. Middletown Income Tax Review Bd.

Appellants' observation that they neither resided nor worked in Middletown when they exercised the options is…