From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McBride v. Wal-Mart Stores E.

United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Apr 27, 2020
Civil Action No. 18-25072-Civ-Scola (S.D. Fla. Apr. 27, 2020)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 18-25072-Civ-Scola

04-27-2020

Diane McBride, Plaintiff, v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P., Defendant.


Order to Show Cause Why This Case Should Not Be Dismissed for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction

This matter is before the Court upon an independent review of the record. "As federal courts, we are courts of limited jurisdiction, deriving our power solely from Article III of the Constitution and from the legislative acts of Congress," and "we are bound to assure ourselves of jurisdiction even if the parties fail to raise the issue." Harris v. United States, 149 F.3d 1304, 1308 (11th Cir. 1998). In addition, "a jurisdictional defect cannot be waived by the parties and may be raised at any point during litigation." Allen v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., 155 F. App'x 480, 481 (11th Cir. 2005). Plaintiff Diane McBride sued Defendant Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P., in federal court on the basis of diversity jurisdiction. (Compl., ECF No. 16 at 1.) For the reasons stated below, it is unclear whether the Court has subject matter jurisdiction.

District courts "ha[ve] diversity jurisdiction when the parties are citizens of different states and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000." Shanyfelt v. Wachovia Mortg. FSB, 439 F. App'x 793, 793 (11th Cir. 2011) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)). "The burden for establishing federal subject matter jurisdiction rests with the party bringing the claim." Sweet Pea Marine, Ltd. v. APJ Marine, Inc., 411 F.3d 1242, 1247 (11th Cir. 2005). According to the complaint, the Plaintiff is a citizen of Florida, while Defendant Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. "is a citizen of Lexington, Kentucky and Bentonville, Arkansas." (ECF No. 16 at 1.) Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P., is, apparently, a limited partnership.

"To sufficiently allege the citizenships of . . . unincorporated business entities, a party must list the citizenships of all the . . . partners of the limited partnership." Rolling Greens MHP, L.P. v. Comcast SCH Holdings L.L.C., 374 F.3d 1020, 1022 (11th Cir. 2004). The complaint does not identify any of the partners of the limited partnership, much less list each partner's citizenship. Consequently, the Plaintiff "has not established whether complete diversity exists, and the [complaint] fails to satisfy the prerequisites of subject matter jurisdiction. Atl. Hosp. of Fla. LLC v. Gen. Star Indem. Co., No. 09-23661, 2010 WL 2639637, at *1 (S.D. Fla. June 29, 2010) (Cooke, J.) (remanding action to state court).

Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that by May 7, 2020, the Plaintiff shall show cause why this matter should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

Done and ordered, at Miami, Florida, on April 27, 2020.

/s/_________

Robert N. Scola, Jr.

United States District Judge Copy via U.S. mail to: Diane McBride
P.O. Box 213
Midway, FL 32343


Summaries of

McBride v. Wal-Mart Stores E.

United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Apr 27, 2020
Civil Action No. 18-25072-Civ-Scola (S.D. Fla. Apr. 27, 2020)
Case details for

McBride v. Wal-Mart Stores E.

Case Details

Full title:Diane McBride, Plaintiff, v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida

Date published: Apr 27, 2020

Citations

Civil Action No. 18-25072-Civ-Scola (S.D. Fla. Apr. 27, 2020)

Citing Cases

Miles v. Wal-Mart Stores E, LP

The Court notes that Defendant has frequently failed to properly allege its citizenship in federal court.…

Chapman v. Wal-Mart Stores E., L.P.

The Court notes that Defendant has frequently failed to properly allege its citizenship in federal court -…