From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McArthur v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 5, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:17-CV-2076 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 5, 2019)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:17-CV-2076

03-05-2019

LYNN MCARTHUR, Plaintiff v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant


( ) ORDER

AND NOW, this 5th day of March, 2019, upon consideration of the report (Doc. 19) of Magistrate Judge Karoline Mehalchick, recommending that the court vacate the decision of the administrative law judge denying the application of plaintiff Lynn McArthur ("McArthur") for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits, and it appearing that the Acting Commissioner of Social Security ("Commissioner") has not objected to the report, see FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(2), and the court noting that failure of a party to timely object to a magistrate judge's conclusions "may result in forfeiture of de novo review at the district court level," Nara v. Frank, 488 F.3d 187, 194 (3d Cir. 2007) (citing Henderson v. Carlson, 812 F.2d 874, 878-79 (3d Cir. 1987)), but that, as a matter of good practice, a district court should afford "reasoned consideration" to the uncontested portions of the report, E.E.O.C. v. City of Long Branch, 866 F.3d 93, 100 (3d Cir. 2017) (quoting Henderson, 812 F.2d at 879), in order to "satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record," FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), advisory committee notes, and, following independent review of the record, the court being in agreement with Judge Mehalchick's recommendation, and concluding that there is no clear error on the face of the record, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The report (Doc. 19) of Magistrate Judge Mehalchick is ADOPTED.

2. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in favor of McArthur and against the Commissioner as set forth in the following paragraph.

3. The Commissioner's decision is VACATED and this matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner with instructions to conduct a new administrative hearing, develop the record fully, and evaluate the evidence appropriately in accordance with this order and the report (Doc. 19) of Magistrate Judge Mehalchick.

4. The Clerk of Court shall thereafter CLOSE this case.

/S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER

Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge

United States District Court

Middle District of Pennsylvania


Summaries of

McArthur v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 5, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:17-CV-2076 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 5, 2019)
Case details for

McArthur v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:LYNN MCARTHUR, Plaintiff v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of the…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Mar 5, 2019

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:17-CV-2076 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 5, 2019)

Citing Cases

McArthur v. Kijakazi

McArthur v. Berryhill, No. 1:17-CV-2076, 2019 WL 1051200 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 30, 2019), report and recommendation…

Weller v. Saul

Applying these legal benchmarks, courts have frequently remanded cases for further consideration by the…