From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McArdle v. Stahl

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Mar 11, 2004
No. 03-04-00075-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 11, 2004)

Opinion

No. 03-04-00075-CV.

Filed: March 11, 2004.

Appeal from the District Court of Williamson County, 368th Judicial District, No. 03-064-C368-a, Honorable Burt Carnes, Judge Presiding.

Dismissed on Appellants' Motion.

Before Chief Justice LAW, Justices PATTERSON and PURYEAR.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Appellants filed an unopposed motion to dismiss their appeal advising that the trial court has denied their motion to sever their action against appellees Stahl and Bassett from claims against a third defendant. As a result, the summary judgment granted in favor of appellees is interlocutory and not appealable. See Teer v. Duddlesten, 664 S.W.2d 702, 703 (Tex. 1984). The appeal is dismissed on the motion of appellants. Tex.R.App.P. 42.1(a)(1).


Summaries of

McArdle v. Stahl

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Mar 11, 2004
No. 03-04-00075-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 11, 2004)
Case details for

McArdle v. Stahl

Case Details

Full title:JAMES McARDLE AND CHUNG McARDLE, Appellants v. ERIC STAHL AND SUSAN…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin

Date published: Mar 11, 2004

Citations

No. 03-04-00075-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 11, 2004)