Opinion
01-17-2023
Wendy M. MAZZA v. Samuel T. MAZZA, Jr.
Neil R. Marcus and Alexander Copp, Danbury, in support of the petition. Kathy Boufford, Newtown, in opposition.
Neil R. Marcus and Alexander Copp, Danbury, in support of the petition.
Kathy Boufford, Newtown, in opposition.
The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 216 Conn. App. 285, 285 A.3d 90 (2022), is granted, limited to the following issue:
"Did the Appellate Court incorrectly conclude that the trial court had properly determined that the parties’ separation agreement, which provided that ‘the plaintiff [would] receive 50 [percent] of all awards from [the] defendant's workers’ compensation suit,’ clearly and unambiguously included that portion of such awards representing payment for the defendant's medical expenses, notwithstanding the plaintiff's statement to the trial court when judgment was rendered indicating that she would not be entitled to a share of the workers’ compensation payments intended for such medical expenses?"