Mazur v. Hartford Life Accident Company

Full title: THOMAS MAZUR, Plaintiff, v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT COMPANY, Defendant

Court: United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Nov 28, 2007

CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-01045 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 28, 2007)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-01045.

November 28, 2007

DONETTA AMBROSE, District Judge

On August 8, 2006, this case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Francis X. Caiazza for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

On November 8, 2007, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 37) recommending that the District Court grant the Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 16) filed by the Defendant Hartford and deny the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff Mazur (Doc 19). Service of the Report and Recommendation was made on all parties. No Objections were filed.

Following a review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 28^th day of November 2007, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 16) filed by the Defendant Hartford be GRANTED and that the Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 19) filed by the Plaintiff Mazur be DENIED.

The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Caiazza (Doc. 37) dated November 8 2007, is hereby adopted as the opinion of the court.