From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mayole v. B. Crystal Son, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1943
266 App. Div. 1008 (N.Y. App. Div. 1943)

Opinion

November 1, 1943.


Action to recover damages for personal injuries suffered as a consequence of plaster falling upon the plaintiff while he was in a loft building owned by the defendant. Judgment for the defendant reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. The court committed error in excluding the testimony of plaintiff's medical witness as to the condition or conditions for which the electro-encephalogram was a test. It was also error to exclude the electro-encephalogram and the records respecting it made in the regular course of business. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 374-a; People v. Kohlmeyer, 284 N.Y. 366.) It may not be said that these errors were not prejudicial. Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mayole v. B. Crystal Son, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1943
266 App. Div. 1008 (N.Y. App. Div. 1943)
Case details for

Mayole v. B. Crystal Son, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:FRANK MAYOLE, Appellant, v. B. CRYSTAL SON, INC., Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1943

Citations

266 App. Div. 1008 (N.Y. App. Div. 1943)

Citing Cases

People v. Jones

The electro-encephalogram report, however, of a doctor is admissible in evidence under this rule. ( Mayole v.…

People v. Campbell

The People cite cases for the proposition that hospital tests are admissible in evidence per se under the…