From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mayo v. State

Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
Jun 7, 2012
No. 06-11-00247-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 7, 2012)

Opinion

No. 06-11-00247-CR

06-07-2012

MISTY LAVERNA DALE MAYO, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the 354th Judicial District Court

Hunt County, Texas

Trial Court No. 26,303


Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Misty Laverna Dale Mayo entered an open plea of guilty to all fourteen charges spread across five cases tried together in Hunt County, Texas. The multiple counts included charges for injury to a child, indecency with a child by contact, sexual assault of a child, and aggravated sexual assault of a child. The trial court accepted her plea, found her guilty on all counts, and ultimately sentenced her to various terms of confinement ranging from ten to fifty years each. After finding errors in the judgments regarding whether the sentences for the eight charges contained in the last two cases were to be served concurrently or consecutively, the trial court attempted to correct the errors by entering nunc pro tunc judgments with revised sentencing instructions.

The five cases before us on appeal, all resolved by opinions issued today, are as follows:

Here, Mayo appeals from her convictions in trial court cause number 26,303. She contends that the trial court erred in entering: (1) the nunc pro tunc judgments because they were not issued in her presence; (2) the nunc pro tunc judgments because they vary from the trial court's oral pronouncement of sentence; and (3) the original judgments because they varied from the trial court's oral pronouncement of sentence.

Since the issues and arguments raised in this case are identical to those presented in Mayo's companion appeal from trial court cause number 26,279, and for the reasons stated in our opinion in Mayo v. State, cause number 06-11-00246-CR, we modify the nunc pro tunc judgments and affirm the judgments as modified.

Bailey Moseley

Justice
Do Not Publish

+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦Appeal Case Number ¦Trial Case Number ¦Count: Offense ¦Sentence ¦Sentence Group ¦ +--------------------+-------------------+----------------+----------+----------------¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Count 1: injury ¦10 years ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦to a child ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦06-11-00243-CR ¦26,276 +----------------+----------¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Count 2: injury ¦10 years ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦to a child ¦ ¦ ¦ +--------------------+-------------------+----------------+----------¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Count 1: injury ¦10 years ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦to a child ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦06-11-00244-CR ¦26,277 +----------------+----------¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Count 2: injury ¦10 years ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦to a child ¦ ¦A ¦ +--------------------+-------------------+----------------+----------¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Count 1: ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦aggravated ¦50 years ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦sexual assault ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦of a child ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦06-11-00245-CR ¦26,278 +----------------+----------¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Count 2: ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦aggravated ¦50 years ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦sexual assault ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦of a child ¦ ¦ ¦ +--------------------+-------------------+----------------+----------+----------------¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Count 1: ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦indecency with a¦20 years ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦child by contact¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ +----------------+----------¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Count 2: ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦indecency with a¦20 years ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦child by contact¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ +----------------+----------¦ ¦ ¦06-11-00246-CR ¦26,279 ¦Count 3: ¦ ¦B ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦aggravated ¦50 years ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦sexual assault ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦of a child ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ +----------------+----------¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Count 4: ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦aggravated ¦50 years ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦sexual assault ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦of a child ¦ ¦ ¦ +--------------------+-------------------+----------------+----------+----------------¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Count 1: ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦indecency with a¦20 years ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦child by contact¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ +----------------+----------¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Count 2: sexual ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦assault of a ¦50 years ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦child ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦06-11-00247-CR ¦26,303 +----------------+----------¦C ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Count 3: sexual ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦assault of a ¦50 years ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦child ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ +----------------+----------¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Count 4: sexual ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦assault of a ¦50 years ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦child ¦ ¦ ¦ +-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+


Summaries of

Mayo v. State

Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
Jun 7, 2012
No. 06-11-00247-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 7, 2012)
Case details for

Mayo v. State

Case Details

Full title:MISTY LAVERNA DALE MAYO, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

Date published: Jun 7, 2012

Citations

No. 06-11-00247-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 7, 2012)