From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mayo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Aug 14, 2002
825 So. 2d 1006 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Summary

noting that "the records attached to the trial court's order denying relief appear to be nothing more than clerk's notes and do not conclusively refute the claim"

Summary of this case from Burke v. State

Opinion

Case No. 4D02-2070

Opinion filed August 14, 2002. Rehearing Denied October 1, 2002.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800(a) motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Dorian K. Damoorgian, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 99-23052 CF10A 98-24495 CF10A.

Eccles Mayo, Immokalee, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Claudine M. LaFrance, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Eccles Mayo, Appellant, timely challenges the trial court's denial of his rule 3.800(a) motion for jail credit. Appellant's motion complied with Toro v. State, 719 So.2d 947, 948 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). Furthermore, the records attached to the trial court's order denying relief appear to be nothing more than clerk's notes and do not conclusively refute the claim. Accordingly, we reverse and remand to the trial court for attachment of records conclusively refuting the claim, if such is possible. If the record available to the trial court establishes that Appellant is entitled to the credit he requests, the court shall award him the jail credit. If the record does not refute the claim and an evidentiary hearing is necessary, the motion should be denied without prejudice to Appellant raising a timely motion for postconviction relief, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

POLEN, C.J., FARMER and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mayo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Aug 14, 2002
825 So. 2d 1006 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

noting that "the records attached to the trial court's order denying relief appear to be nothing more than clerk's notes and do not conclusively refute the claim"

Summary of this case from Burke v. State
Case details for

Mayo v. State

Case Details

Full title:ECCLES MAYO, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Aug 14, 2002

Citations

825 So. 2d 1006 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Citing Cases

Collins v. State

Furthermore, the record portions attached to the trial court's order were clerk's notes that do not…

Clark v. State

However, the "Time Served Calculator" and accompanying annotations, attached to the trial court's order were…