From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mayo v. Palomba

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 10, 2010
09 Civ. 9922 (DLC) (S.D.N.Y. May. 10, 2010)

Opinion

09 Civ. 9922 (DLC).

May 10, 2010


ORDER


By Order dated April 6, 2010, plaintiff was directed to communicate with the Court, in writing, by May 6, 2010, as to why plaintiff has failed to serve the summons and complaint within the 120 days prescribed by Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Having received no communication from plaintiff, it is hereby

ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court shall close the case.

SO ORDERED:


Summaries of

Mayo v. Palomba

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 10, 2010
09 Civ. 9922 (DLC) (S.D.N.Y. May. 10, 2010)
Case details for

Mayo v. Palomba

Case Details

Full title:MATTHEW MAYO, Plaintiff, v. SGT. PALOMBA, OFFICER J. TEJEDA, OFFICER…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: May 10, 2010

Citations

09 Civ. 9922 (DLC) (S.D.N.Y. May. 10, 2010)