Mayo v. Askew

Full title: DAVID LEE MAYO, Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY ASKEW, et al., Defendants.

Court: DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 29, 2014

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11cv392-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Sep. 29, 2014)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11cv392-MHT (WO)

09-29-2014

DAVID LEE MAYO, Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY ASKEW, et al., Defendants.

Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows:

(1) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. No. 80) is adopted.

(2) The defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 28) is denied.

(3) The defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 28) is granted.

(4) This lawsuit is dismissed without prejudice.

It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue.

The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

This case is closed.

DONE, this the 29th day of September, 2014.

/s/ Myron H. Thompson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE