From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maynard v. Oakes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 27, 1988
144 A.D.2d 229 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

October 27, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Fulton County (Walsh, Jr., J.).


This action was commenced in Supreme Court to recover for alleged wrongful death and conscious pain and suffering resulting from a collision in Putnam County between an automobile operated by defendant and a motorcycle operated by plaintiff's decedent. Plaintiff properly designated Fulton County as the place of trial because he was a resident of and was appointed administrator in that county (see, CPLR 503 [b]). Defendant, a resident of Putnam County, moved for a discretionary change of venue to that county on the grounds that the convenience of the material witnesses and the ends of justice would be promoted by the change (see, CPLR 510). Supreme Court denied the motion, and defendant appeals.

In support of the motion, defendant indicated his intention to call the following witnesses: Gary Joanson, the policeman who investigated the accident and filed a report, a resident of Putnam County; William Stahl, Putnam County Coroner, for the primary purpose of establishing the interval of time between the accident and death; the persons on duty at Putnam County Hospital at the time plaintiff's decedent arrived; Kirk Shreve, the employer of plaintiff's decedent, a resident of Putnam County; possibly, the owner of the motorcycle, a resident of Dutchess County; and the driver of the ambulance which transported plaintiff's decedent to the hospital, identity and residence unknown. Defendant came forward with no evidence of inconvenience to witnesses other than the approximately 2 1/2-hour drive between Fulton and Putnam Counties.

Defendant has failed to meet his burden of establishing that the convenience of witnesses and the ends of justice will be served by the change of venue (see, Edwards v. Lamberta, 42 A.D.2d 1003). The materiality of the testimony of Stahl, hospital personnel and the ambulance driver is questionable in view of plaintiff's stipulation to admission of the hospital records, death certificate and Coroner's report, and that plaintiff's decedent died within seconds following the accident. The owner of the motorcycle is not a material witness. Plaintiff's attorney indicated that he intended to call Joanson and Shreve as witnesses and had made arrangements for their travel to Fulton County, thereby minimizing their inconvenience. In our mobile society, a drive of some 2 1/2 hours is not a matter of much inconvenience, and Fulton County's rural character favors retention of venue there (see, Kucich v. Leibowitz, 68 A.D.2d 1002). A motion such as this is addressed to the sound discretion of Supreme Court, which will not be disturbed on appeal unless it is clearly shown to have been abused (see, Blasch v. Chrysler Motors Corp., 84 A.D.2d 894, 894-895).

Order affirmed, with costs. Mahoney, P.J., Kane, Casey, Yesawich, Jr., and Mercure, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Maynard v. Oakes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 27, 1988
144 A.D.2d 229 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

Maynard v. Oakes

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM C. MAYNARD, as Administrator of the Estate of DAVID R. MAYNARD…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Oct 27, 1988

Citations

144 A.D.2d 229 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

Mountain View Recreation, Inc. v. Imperial Commercial Cooking Equip. Co.

We conclude that this argument also provides little, if any, support for respondents' position even if such…

Maerov v. Long Island Airline, LLC

Cf. note 5. Although the convenience of public officers and employees and the use of public records at trial…