From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mayfield City Sch. Dist. v. Cuyahoga Cty.

Supreme Court of Ohio
Mar 31, 1999
707 N.E.2d 506 (Ohio 1999)

Opinion

No. 98-451.

Submitted February 24, 1999.

Decided March 31, 1999.

Appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals, Nos. 97-G-589 and 97-G-594.

This cause is now before the court upon an appeal as of right.

Kelley, McCann Livingstone, L.L.P., Fred J. Livingstone and Robert A. Brindza, for appellant.

Fred Siegel Co., L.P.A., and Annrita S. Johnson, for appellee Aintree Park Apartments.

William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Timothy J. Kollin, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee Cuyahoga County Board of Revision et al.


We affirm this decision on the authority of Worthington City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 156, 707 N.E.2d 499, decided today.

Decision affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.


I dissent for the same reasons expressed in my dissent in Worthington City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 156, 161-165, 707 N.E.2d 499, 503-505, decided today.

Cook, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.


Summaries of

Mayfield City Sch. Dist. v. Cuyahoga Cty.

Supreme Court of Ohio
Mar 31, 1999
707 N.E.2d 506 (Ohio 1999)
Case details for

Mayfield City Sch. Dist. v. Cuyahoga Cty.

Case Details

Full title:Mayfield City School District Board of Education, Appellant; Aintree Park…

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Mar 31, 1999

Citations

707 N.E.2d 506 (Ohio 1999)
707 N.E.2d 506