Mayes v. Potter

Full title: THOMAS S. MAYES, Plaintiff, v. JOHN E. POTTER, U.S. POSTAL SERVICE…

Court: United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Oct 25, 2006

Civil Action No. 03-cv-00386-BNB-PAC (D. Colo. Oct. 25, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 03-cv-00386-BNB-PAC.

October 25, 2006

ORDER

BOYD BOLAND, Magistrate Judge

This matter arises in connection with Defendant's Reply to Response in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. #76, filed 10/24/06] (the "Reply"). The Reply is STRICKEN.

The defendant filed a motion for summary judgment on May 26, 2004 [Doc. #33]. The plaintiff responded to the motion on June 17, 2004 [Doc. #34]. The defendant filed a reply on June 29, 2004 [Doc. #35]. The summary judgment motion was denied without prejudice on February 7, 2005 [Doc. #41]. Subsequently, the matter was rebriefed in 2005 [Docs. #49, #53, and #56], and an order was issued on March 3, 2006 [Doc. #59], granting summary judgment in part and denying it in part .

The defendant now has inexplicably resubmitted his reply brief in support of the already decided motion for summary judgment.

IT IS ORDERED that the Reply is STRICKEN.