From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mayes v. Potter

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Oct 25, 2006
Civil Action No. 03-cv-00386-BNB-PAC (D. Colo. Oct. 25, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 03-cv-00386-BNB-PAC.

October 25, 2006


ORDER


This matter arises in connection with Defendant's Reply to Response in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. #76, filed 10/24/06] (the "Reply"). The Reply is STRICKEN.

The defendant filed a motion for summary judgment on May 26, 2004 [Doc. #33]. The plaintiff responded to the motion on June 17, 2004 [Doc. #34]. The defendant filed a reply on June 29, 2004 [Doc. #35]. The summary judgment motion was denied without prejudice on February 7, 2005 [Doc. #41]. Subsequently, the matter was rebriefed in 2005 [Docs. #49, #53, and #56], and an order was issued on March 3, 2006 [Doc. #59], granting summary judgment in part and denying it in part .

The defendant now has inexplicably resubmitted his reply brief in support of the already decided motion for summary judgment.

IT IS ORDERED that the Reply is STRICKEN.


Summaries of

Mayes v. Potter

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Oct 25, 2006
Civil Action No. 03-cv-00386-BNB-PAC (D. Colo. Oct. 25, 2006)
Case details for

Mayes v. Potter

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS S. MAYES, Plaintiff, v. JOHN E. POTTER, U.S. POSTAL SERVICE…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Oct 25, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 03-cv-00386-BNB-PAC (D. Colo. Oct. 25, 2006)