From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mayes v. Hospitals

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Nov 5, 2013
2:12-cv-1726-KJM-EFB (E.D. Cal. Nov. 5, 2013)

Opinion


EDWARD MAYES, Plaintiff, v. KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS, et al., Defendants. No. 2:12-cv-1726-KJM-EFB United States District Court, E.D. California. November 5, 2013

          ORDER

          EDMUND F. BRENNAN, Magistrate Judge.

         On October 30, 2013, the court heard plaintiff's motion to compel defendants Kaiser Foundation Hospital ("Kaiser"), Janitress Nathaniel, and Sherrie Ambrose (collectively "defendants") to respond to plaintiff's discovery requests. ECF No. 36. Attorney John Stoller appeared on behalf of plaintiff; attorney Seth Neulight appeared on behalf of defendants.

         For the reasons stated on the record, plaintiff's motion is denied as to his request that Kaiser be compelled to respond to plaintiff's First Request for Production of Documents, requests numbers one though four and six through nine. As stated on the record, plaintiff's motion as to his request that defendants Nathaniel and Ambrose be compelled to respond to plaintiff's requests for production of documents is denied without prejudice to renewal after the depositions of Nathaniel and Ambrose have been completed.

         SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Mayes v. Hospitals

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Nov 5, 2013
2:12-cv-1726-KJM-EFB (E.D. Cal. Nov. 5, 2013)
Case details for

Mayes v. Hospitals

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD MAYES, Plaintiff, v. KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 5, 2013

Citations

2:12-cv-1726-KJM-EFB (E.D. Cal. Nov. 5, 2013)