From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mayes v. Coyle

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
Mar 7, 2023
1:23-CV-11-TAV-SKL (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 7, 2023)

Opinion

1:23-CV-11-TAV-SKL

03-07-2023

JAMAAL M. MAYES, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW COYLE, et al., Defendants.


JUDGMENT ORDER

THOMAS A. VARLAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

For the reasons expressed in the Memorandum and Order filed this day, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that this prisoner's pro se civil rights action, filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, is DISMISSED as frivolous. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and 1915A(b)(1).

Because the Court CERTIFIED in its Memorandum and Order that an appeal from this decision would not be taken in good faith, the Court DENIES Plaintiff leave to proceed as a pauper on any subsequent appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 24.

The Clerk is DIRECTED to CLOSE this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

ENTERED AS A JUDGMENT.


Summaries of

Mayes v. Coyle

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
Mar 7, 2023
1:23-CV-11-TAV-SKL (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 7, 2023)
Case details for

Mayes v. Coyle

Case Details

Full title:JAMAAL M. MAYES, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW COYLE, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee

Date published: Mar 7, 2023

Citations

1:23-CV-11-TAV-SKL (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 7, 2023)