From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

May v. Patterson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
May 21, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-00675-CB-B (S.D. Ala. May. 21, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-00675-CB-B

05-21-2012

DERIC LaVELLE MAY, Plaintiff, v. TONY PATTERSON, et al. Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff Deric LaVelle May, an Alabama prison inmate proceeding pro se, has filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. (Doc. 12.) After de novo review of all matters to which objection is raised, the Court finds that the objections are without merit.

Plaintiff filed a motion for preliminary injunction directing Defendants to provide him with certain medical treatment for a malfunctioning ventriculoperitoneal shunt ("VP shunt"). The Magistrate Judge has recommended that the motion be denied because Plaintiff has failed to identify a specific, imminent injury he will suffer if preliminary injunctive relief does not issue. In his objection, Plaintiff points out two potential injuries. First, he notes that a malfunctioning VP shunt can become life threatening if not treated. He does not, however, aver any imminent threat of injury. Second, Plaintiff avers that any blow to the head could result in his death. Because he suffers from a seizure disorder and is housed in an unpadded segregated cell, Plaintiff argues that he is at imminent risk of serious injury or death. However, this risk is unrelated to the relief sought and would not be alleviated if relief were granted. Based on the evidence submitted by Plaintiff, the risk of injury from a blow to the head is always present due

to the existence of the VP shunt. It is not caused by the malfunctioning of the shunt. The basis of this lawsuit and the motion for preliminary injunction is Defendants' alleged failure to provide adequate medical treatment for the malfunctioning VP shunt. Consequently, neither of the potential injuries identified by Plaintiff in his objection to the Report and Recommendation is sufficient to support a preliminary injunction.

Plaintiff has attached what appear to be excerpts of transcripts from his sentencing hearing. The Plaintiff's mother, Joyce Ware, testified that "the doctor [told]me . . . that . . . just one blow to the head. . . could be fatal." (Pl.'s Ex. A2, Doc. 25.) Mrs. Ware also testified that he had

Accordingly, the objections are OVERRULED, and the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.

Charles R. Butler, Jr.

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

May v. Patterson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
May 21, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-00675-CB-B (S.D. Ala. May. 21, 2012)
Case details for

May v. Patterson

Case Details

Full title:DERIC LaVELLE MAY, Plaintiff, v. TONY PATTERSON, et al. Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: May 21, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-00675-CB-B (S.D. Ala. May. 21, 2012)