From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

May v. Heiner

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Jun 24, 1929
32 F.2d 1017 (3d Cir. 1929)

Opinion

No. 3811.

January 9, 1929. Rehearing Denied June 24, 1929.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania; W.H. Seward Thomson, Judge.

Sachs Caplan and Charles H. Sachs, all of Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellants.

John D. Meyer, U.S. Atty., Wm. J. Aiken, Asst. U.S. Atty., and John A. McCann, Sp. Asst. U.S. Atty., all of Pittsburgh, Pa. (C.M. Charest and Ottamar Hamele, both of Washington, D.C., of counsel), for appellee.

Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.


Affirmed, on the opinion of the court below [ 25 F.2d 1004], with the observation that this case is distinguished from Nichols v. Coolidge, 274 U.S. 531, 47 S. Ct. 710, 71 L. Ed. 1184, 52 A.L.R. 1081, on the facts.


Summaries of

May v. Heiner

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Jun 24, 1929
32 F.2d 1017 (3d Cir. 1929)
Case details for

May v. Heiner

Case Details

Full title:Walter A. MAY et al., Appellants, v. D.B. HEINER, Collector, Appellee

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Jun 24, 1929

Citations

32 F.2d 1017 (3d Cir. 1929)