From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maxwell v. Hedgpeth

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 23, 2011
CASE NO. CV 10-8749-DMG (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 23, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. CV 10-8749-DMG (PJW)

09-23-2011

MARVIN MAXWELL, Petitioner, v. A. HEDGPETH, WARDEN, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES

MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has not filed any written objections to the Report. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

Further, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right or that the court erred in its procedural ruling and, therefore, a certificate of appealability will not issue in this action. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).

DOLLY M. GEE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
C:\Temp\notesE1EF34\LA10CV08749DMG(PJW)_Maxwell_ Order Accepting.wpd


Summaries of

Maxwell v. Hedgpeth

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 23, 2011
CASE NO. CV 10-8749-DMG (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 23, 2011)
Case details for

Maxwell v. Hedgpeth

Case Details

Full title:MARVIN MAXWELL, Petitioner, v. A. HEDGPETH, WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 23, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. CV 10-8749-DMG (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 23, 2011)