From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mausbach v. Mausbach

Supreme Court of Nebraska
Feb 24, 1989
435 N.W.2d 914 (Neb. 1989)

Opinion

No. 87-150.

Filed February 24, 1989.

Appeal from the District Court for Douglas County: JAMES A. BUCKLEY, Judge. Affirmed.

Jerome J. Ortman for appellant.

David L. Herzog, P.C., for appellee.

HASTINGS, C.J., GRANT, and FAHRNBRUCH, JJ., and HENDRIX and OLBERDING, D. JJ.


The petitioner, Eugene L. Mausbach, appeals the division of property, alimony order, and allowance of an attorney fee in this dissolution proceeding.

As required in cases of this nature, we have reviewed the record de novo to determine whether the district court abused its discretion in dividing the property, granting an amount of alimony, and allowing an attorney fee. See Decker v. Decker, 229 Neb. 347, 426 N.W.2d 533 (1988).

We determine that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in either the division of assets or its award of alimony and attorney fee. Accordingly, the decree of the trial court is affirmed. The request for attorney fees in this court is denied.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Mausbach v. Mausbach

Supreme Court of Nebraska
Feb 24, 1989
435 N.W.2d 914 (Neb. 1989)
Case details for

Mausbach v. Mausbach

Case Details

Full title:EUGENE L. MAUSBACH, APPELLANT, v. DEENA L. MAUSBACH, APPELLEE

Court:Supreme Court of Nebraska

Date published: Feb 24, 1989

Citations

435 N.W.2d 914 (Neb. 1989)
231 Neb. 280