No. 97-16021
Filed December 2, 1998
D.C. No. CV-95-02729-RCB
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion, Mauro v. Arpaio, No. 97-16021, slip op. at 10013 (9th Cir. Sept. 1, 1998), is withdrawn.
ordering rehearing en banc
Summary of this case from Waterman v. FarmerFull title:JONATHAN D. MAURO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JOSEPH M. ARPAIO, Sheriff…
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Date published: Dec 2, 1998
Because vagueness and overbreadth challenges embody "constitutional claims," they must be analyzed under the…
Strope v. CollinsPlaintiffs cite Mauro v. Arpaio, 147 F.3d 1137 (9th Cir. 1998), in which the Ninth Circuit held that a prison…