From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maurice v. Mahon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 1, 1997
239 A.D.2d 188 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

May 1, 1997

Appeal from Supreme Court, New York County (Norman Ryp, J.).


Appellant driver's deposition testimony regarding her ingestion of prescription medication just before she was served alcohol by defendant-respondent, in conjunction with appellants' cross claim for indemnification, constitutes an affirmative assertion of her medical condition ( see, Koump v. Smith, 25 N.Y.2d 287, 294-295), and a waiver of any doctor-patient privilege concerning the medical and prescription records sought by respondent ( see, Dillenbeck v. Hess, 73 N.Y.2d 278, 287).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Milonas, Nardelli, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Maurice v. Mahon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 1, 1997
239 A.D.2d 188 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Maurice v. Mahon

Case Details

Full title:LISA MAURICE, Plaintiff, v. ADRIENNE MAHON et al., Appellants, and CHARLIE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 1, 1997

Citations

239 A.D.2d 188 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
657 N.Y.S.2d 897

Citing Cases

Wells v. N.Y.C. Transit Auth.

In contrast, where a defendant asserted at a deposition that he recalled swerving to avoid another…

People v. Pagan

In other words, she freely spoke of her medical condition in connection with a criminal investigation…