Opinion
Argued October 28, 1889
Decided November 26, 1889
George L. Rives for appellants.
John E. Eustis for respondent.
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
Argued October 28, 1889
Decided November 26, 1889
George L. Rives for appellants.
John E. Eustis for respondent.
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
Full title:HENRY MAURER, Respondent, v . CHARLES H. BLISS et al., Appellants
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Nov 26, 1889
" The rule here adopted is compactly stated in Heath Dry Gas Co. v. Hurd ( 193 N.Y. 255, 259): "In this…
Matter of O'Neill( Berger Mfg. Co. v. City of New York, 206 N.Y. 24, 32.) It seems clear section 12-a Lien of the Lien Law was…